LONDON: British PM Rishi Sunak’s government must hand over potentially embarrassing WhatsApp messages sought by its own public inquiry into the Covid pandemic after it lost a legal battle at London’s HC on Thursday.
Britain’s cabinet office had refused to provide the WhatsApp messages concerning the government’s handling of the pandemic and other political issues last month, saying some of the material sought was “unambiguously irrelevant”.
The inquiry’s chair Heather Hallett had asked the government to provide two years’ worth of messages, including from Sunak, former PM Boris Johnson and nearly 40 other senior figures and advisers. The cabinet office brought a legal challenge against the inquiry’s demand, arguing the request was too broad. Its lawyers said the messages contained some references to personal information and comments about identifiable government figures.
But its case was opposed by Johnson, who had said when announcing the inquiry in 2021 that it must be “free to scrutinise every document”. The cabinet office’s challenge was rejected in a written ruling on Thursday. The government said it would comply with the decision. Judges James Dingemans and Neil Garnham said that requests for documents by public inquiries were “bound to lead to the inclusion of irrelevant material”, but that did not make the request unlawful. They added that the Cabinet Office could still apply to the COVID inquiry to not have to produce material which did not relate to a matter in question at the inquiry.”The court’s judgment is a sensible resolution and will mean that the Inquiry Chair is able to see the information she may deem relevant, but we can work together to have an arrangement that respects the privacy of individuals and ensures completely irrelevant information is returned,” a government spokesperson said.
Britain’s cabinet office had refused to provide the WhatsApp messages concerning the government’s handling of the pandemic and other political issues last month, saying some of the material sought was “unambiguously irrelevant”.
The inquiry’s chair Heather Hallett had asked the government to provide two years’ worth of messages, including from Sunak, former PM Boris Johnson and nearly 40 other senior figures and advisers. The cabinet office brought a legal challenge against the inquiry’s demand, arguing the request was too broad. Its lawyers said the messages contained some references to personal information and comments about identifiable government figures.
But its case was opposed by Johnson, who had said when announcing the inquiry in 2021 that it must be “free to scrutinise every document”. The cabinet office’s challenge was rejected in a written ruling on Thursday. The government said it would comply with the decision. Judges James Dingemans and Neil Garnham said that requests for documents by public inquiries were “bound to lead to the inclusion of irrelevant material”, but that did not make the request unlawful. They added that the Cabinet Office could still apply to the COVID inquiry to not have to produce material which did not relate to a matter in question at the inquiry.”The court’s judgment is a sensible resolution and will mean that the Inquiry Chair is able to see the information she may deem relevant, but we can work together to have an arrangement that respects the privacy of individuals and ensures completely irrelevant information is returned,” a government spokesperson said.