It said in case of non-essential items, the government can allow “substitution effects to play out before responding to domestic supply concerns”. For instance, if sugar prices rise, consumers can consume less of it or switch to jaggery, according to the survey.
“In general, it is far easier for consumers to substitute or pare back consumption than for farmers to endure big losses because of ad hoc export bans or huge imports,” it noted. The survey also said India’s inflation targeting framework should consider targeting inflation, excluding food. When the central bank appeals to the government to control the increase in prices of food products, it prevents farmers from benefiting from the rise in terms of trade in their favour.
Enhancing private sector investment in agriculture and improving market infrastructure by incentivising states is also vital to give impetus to the agriculture sector, according to the survey.
It also highlighted that incomes of farmers with small landholdings cannot be increased by growing wheat and paddy alone, adding that farmers need to move to high-value agriculture such as fruits and vegetables, fisheries, poultry, dairy and buffalo meat. The survey suggested that promoting farmer producer organisations, e-National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) and allowing cooperatives to participate in agri-marketing could lead to better price discovery. e-NAM refers to a pan-India electronic trading portal that connects existing Agricultural Produce and Livestock Market Committees (APMCs) to create a unified national market for agricultural commodities. The survey noted that promoting crop diversification requires addressing critical issues such as investment in agri-infrastructure, credit accessibility and appropriate market institutions.