“India is doing very well in terms of its growth rates. This year we have (projected) 7%, medium term growth (will be) 6.5- 7%; it’s contribution to global growth is 17%. It is one of the fastest growing major global economies in the world. To get to even higher growth numbers, to keep up the momentum, it would require a very strong reform agenda, that’s something government is working on,” Gopinath said in an interview with the Times of India.
Gopinath expanded on the reforms, explaining that the subcontinent would need to push job growth and focus on ease of doing business in a bid to attract more investment and aid growth.
“The 7% growth is coming along with not as much employment creation, and that’s an area where attention needs to be given,” the IMF boss said.
“If you look at investment, private investment, you’re seeing private investment strong in the household sector and real estate. But if you look at, say, investment in machinery and equipment, that’s not as strong,” she added.
“A continued focus on improving the ease of doing business in the regulatory environment, in terms of red tape, will be super helpful,” Gopinath said, adding that the states of Gujarat and Tamil Nadu stand out in terms of foreign investment. “We studied where did foreign direct investment go in India. Two states that stand out are Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, and the other states that also rank very well in terms of business climate,” Gopinath said. Further, the economist said the Narendra Modi government needs to ensure labour market flexibity, saying it was “important in the near term,” and ensure that foreign investment keeps flowing into the country.
“If you look at foreign direct investment in India, there is a lot of interest. You look at announced projects, we’re looking at large numbers, like $80 billion worth of projects. India’s opening up in being able to have fewer trade restrictions will help bring this investment in. Last, something the government has done really well is investing in public infrastructure, both the physical and the digital. But India still is an economy that needs a lot more, and the budget has put in additional funding for public investment,” she said.
Gopinath also touched upon India’s high tariff rates, saying that if India wants to be part of the global supply chains, it will “have to have fairly costless importing and exporting; in the absence of that it is going to be hard to attract investment into the country.”
The IMF economist also said India needs to focus on “education, increasing skilling, including digital digital skills,” in the medium term and that “agricultural sector reforms are going to be important” for the country.
Speaking of the jobs situation, Gopinath said that “incentives help” job growth, calling it a measure that “has been tested.”
“There is the employment linked incentive that was part of the budget that certainly is addressing the problem. As with all policies, it’s important at some point to do a cost-benefit analysis. We crunched some numbers and additional jobs that need to be created between now and 2030 cumulatively ranges between 60 million and 148 million. To get that kind of job creation to happen, it will require broad based reforms,” she added.
Asked about a wealth tax, the economist said the IMF was in favour of a “progressive tax structure,” adding that there are “complications” with wealth taxes.
“For example, for a lot of people, wealth is basically their home. There are implementation issues associated with it, but if you can get capital income tax, well, well done,” she said.
On universal basic income, Gopinath said that a targeted system would be the better option, as a true universal income would be “fiscally large.”
“If you are truly universal it means everybody, (and) that’s very costly for countries. So, either you give everybody extremely little, in which case, it doesn’t really have an impact. Or, if you give them a meaningful amount, it is a very large amount of money. So, it is fiscally large. The point is to do this in a much more targeted fashion, as many countries do, but that’s something that we have seen is if you increase the generosity of unemployment insurance,” Gopinath explained.