US Justice department defends Boeing 737 MAX crash settlement plan after victims’ families object

Boeing acknowledged it had to correct flaws in its 737 MAX flight simulator software used to train pilots, after two deadly crashes involving the aircraft that killed 346 people. (Reuters)


The US Justice Department defended its settlement with Boeing Co. after family members of 737 Max crash victims said the government should have required larger financial penalties and an outside monitor should be court-appointed.

Boeing acknowledged it had to correct flaws in its 737 MAX flight simulator software used to train pilots, after two deadly crashes involving the aircraft that killed 346 people. (Reuters)

The government said in a legal filing Wednesday it has exerted the maximum possible punishment under the circumstances. The filing was in response to a request from families that a Texas federal judge reject the deal.

Also Read: Ola Electric launches the Roadster Series e-motorcycles, prices start at 74,999

“Ultimately, the government’s decision to enter into this Agreement is dictated by what it can prove in court and what it cannot,” according to the filing.

Boeing agreed in July to plead guilty to criminal conspiracy in connection with crashes in 2018 and 2019 that killed 346 people. As part of the deal, which requires the judge’s approval, Boeing would install an independent corporate monitor for three years and spend at least $455 million to bolster its compliance and safety programs.

Boeing also faces a fine of at least $243.6 million. That matches the amount it paid under a 2021 deferred-prosecution agreement that the Justice Department later determined the company had violated.

Also Read: India reported over 400 sexual harassment at work cases every year from 2018 to 2022: Report

Families of the victims said the agreement doesn’t adequately hold Boeing to account for the deaths and the judge should be the one to select the company’s monitor, rather than the Justice Department with input from Boeing. The families also argued that Boeing should face “significantly larger and more meaningful” financial penalties than outlined in the deal.

“The government has the deepest respect for the victims and their passionate advocacy in this matter,” the Justice Department said in the filing. “Yet in the end, after years of investigation, the government has not found the one thing that underlies the families’ most passionate objections to the proposed resolution: evidence that could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Boeing’s fraud caused the deaths of their loved ones.”

Also Read: Hindustan Zinc plans 8,000 crore special dividend, promoter Vedanta may get 5,100 crore for de-leveraging

US District Judge Reed O’Connor, who is overseeing the case, has yet to decide if he’ll hold a hearing on the plea deal.

The case is US v. Boeing, 21-cr-005, US District Court, Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth).



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *