Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are facing criticism for their recent tour of Colombia, with some experts calling it a “rival” royal visit. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who enjoyed a successful trip to South America, are being questioned for doing what they could have done as working royals.
Royal author Robert Jobson shared his thoughts with The Sun, pointing out that Meghan had similar experiences on royal tours to Tonga, Fiji, and Australia, where she received positive media coverage.
He noted that even their tour of South Africa was relatively well-received, despite other controversies at the time.
Jobson expressed confusion over the couple’s actions, questioning why they left the royal family, citing a desire for privacy, only to continue seeking attention. He remarked, “If you’re no longer using your royal title and don’t want to be seen as royal, then cut all that out. It’s ridiculous,” referencing Meghan’s curtsy to the vice president during their recent visit.
The expert’s comments have sparked debate over whether Meghan and Harry are staying true to their intentions or simply reinventing themselves in a different spotlight.
Royal author Robert Jobson shared his thoughts with The Sun, pointing out that Meghan had similar experiences on royal tours to Tonga, Fiji, and Australia, where she received positive media coverage.
He noted that even their tour of South Africa was relatively well-received, despite other controversies at the time.
Jobson expressed confusion over the couple’s actions, questioning why they left the royal family, citing a desire for privacy, only to continue seeking attention. He remarked, “If you’re no longer using your royal title and don’t want to be seen as royal, then cut all that out. It’s ridiculous,” referencing Meghan’s curtsy to the vice president during their recent visit.
The expert’s comments have sparked debate over whether Meghan and Harry are staying true to their intentions or simply reinventing themselves in a different spotlight.